Item Added To Bag.

RBA Slim Sweatpant

Model is wearing: size medium
Roots-undefined-RBA Slim Sweatpant-undefined-A
Style: #39090143

RBA Slim Sweatpant

USD$74.00 USD $59.99
or make 4 payments of $15.00 with Learn more

RBA Slim Sweatpant

Model is wearing: size medium
Roots-undefined-RBA Slim Sweatpant-undefined-A

Variations

  • Colour:

Product Actions

Add to cart options
Quantity
2
3
BLACK
Notify Me
Coming soon. Choose your size and the colour—you will be the first to know when it comes in stock.
Use Find In-Store to check additional availability, options displayed in check out. new
Sold Out
This item is sold out
Sold Out
This item is sold out
Description
Inspired by a Roots favourite, our RBA Park Slim Sweatpant is back in fun new colours. Featuring one of our classic logos in metallic ink and made with our ultra-soft fleece, these sweatpants are designed with welt pockets, an adjustable drawcord, and elastic slim cuff legs.
Details
ABOUT
80% cotton, 20% polyester

SIZE & FIT
Model is wearing: medium
Model Measurements: Height: 6'1" Chest: 39" Waist: 32"; suit size: 40-R; neck: 15.5"; sleeve: 34.5"
Inseams: 29'' All sizes

LOOK AFTER ME
Reverse garment before washing or ironing
Machine wash cold, gentle cycle with like colours
No bleach
Tumble dry low - low iron
Do not iron decoration
Do not dry clean
Easy Returns

You can ship your return or save on shipping by bringing your returned item to one of our stores.

RETURN POLICY
In Store Pick Up

Contactless & easy — At checkout select your store for pick up with available inventory, you will receive an email when your order is ready.

Learn More
RBA Slim Sweatpant is rated 3.2 out of 5 by 13.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great for teens I bought these for my 14 year old son who is out of the largest youth size but still to small for a regular adults small. While they are still a little big, they are much better than the regular fit and look very nice. I highly recommend these as a transition pant for teenage boys.
Date published: 2021-04-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great buy Excellent product. Fits as expected. Washes very well. Totally recommend.
Date published: 2021-04-08
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Super thick These pants are super thick and fleecy, but fit so nicely.
Date published: 2021-03-09
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Quality and fit The quality and material are excellent. The slim fit is smaller than expected; I purchased size large for a tall thin person who normally wears medium or large and it was too tight.
Date published: 2021-03-09
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Length Not tall people friendly, I’m 6ft and was 3 inches to short
Date published: 2021-03-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Short for anyone 5’7 or over. I ordered these because the “originals” were not in stock just before Christmas. My boyfriend is tall & the “originals” fit him size lrg for the length but these are short! I’m a 5’8 a woman & these are too short for me as well. I kept them myself bc it was such a hassle to return during COVID so I wear them around the house though they are way too big in the butt, hips, thighs & waist. I rolled the bottoms to make them look like I’m wearing them a little short bc they look silly like flood pants on me otherwise bc they are too short. The quality of the material is great as usual as Roots has great quality in material & craftsmanship. This style just isn’t long enough for anyone over 5’7 or 5’8. Suggestion- offer these in regular & tall inseam
Date published: 2021-01-23
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Christmas gift. I got this sweat suite for my brother for Christnas.
Date published: 2021-01-21
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Too short, too tight. XXL slim = M original. Sad. The fit of these sweats is terrible. They are super short- several inches of my ankle show! And they are not just a little slimmer than the original sweats... They are extremely skinny cut. I usually wear XL in original so I ordered XXL in these slim sweats. I wanted this colour of sweats and these were the only style available. Anyway, the XXL slim cut fits the same as my wife’s M original cut. So sizing is way off. Super disappointing.
Date published: 2021-01-16